SKILLEMALL.ai

BF arxiv-daily

每日 arXiv 论文获取加整理技能。当用户想要获取每日 arXiv 论文相关领域论文、设置论文订阅、管理论文推送时间、添加新的论文领域时触发。也用于用户询问"arxiv"、"每日论文"、"论文推送"等相关话题时。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Hislocked v0.9.1 MIT-0 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 794 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/like-<category>.txt

ProcedureResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
66
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
31/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/like-<category>.txt
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: arxiv-daily (ClawHub)

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/like-<category>.txt

Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/like-<category>.txt
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/like-<category>.txt
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (arxiv-daily) differs from the folder (arixv-daily)
  • 100Steps. 53 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 794 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low The response is described with custom markup (8 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 107: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 53 items
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a real arXiv digest helper, but it needs Review because it can modify the host Python environment and stores chat-routing details without enough scoping or privacy guidance.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026