SKILLEMALL.ai

AC si

Supernal Interface CLI for test generation, contract scanning, story system, and MCP setup. Use when: (1) scanning Next.js routes/components for contracts, (2) generating tests from @Tool decorators, (3) recording/validating story-based tests, (4) setting up MCP integration, (5) validating contracts. NOT for: task management (use sc), orchestration (use orch), or CLI/API generation patterns (use universal-command).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ianderrington v1.0.0 2 files body ≈ 1 381 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Supernal Interface CLI for test generation, contract scanning, sto… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 4 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1381 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 418: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 18 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 4 items
    • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This appears to be a legitimate developer CLI skill, but it gives an agent broad authority to install software, rewrite project files, change IDE/MCP configuration, and install other agent components without strong safety guidance.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026