SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AF visual-ops-writer

图文运营创作器。从选题、撰写、配图到质检，一条龙完成运营文章生产。看到好文章能仿写，给个 Skill 能生成推广长文，写完正文能自动配图。内置写作质量管控与自动配图能力，图文一体交付。触发词："生成运营文章"、"链接仿写"、"对标分析"、"Skill 推广"、"为正文配图"。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: if530770 v1.0.1 MIT-0 17 files body ≈ 1 171 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 22 h ago

图文运营创作器。从选题、撰写、配图到质检，一条龙完成运营文章生产。看到好文章能仿写，给个 Skill 能生成推广长文，写完正文能自动配图。内置写作质量管控与自动配图能力，图文一体交付。触发词："生成运营文章"、"链接仿写"、"对标分析"、"Skill 推广"、"为正文配图"。

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: URL

GeneratorAI and agentsWriting and documentsCustomer supporttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: URL
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: URL

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: URL
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: URL
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 33 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1171 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 138: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 21 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This writing-and-image skill is mostly purpose-aligned, but it fetches URLs and images with TLS verification disabled and has under-disclosed credential handling.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 7 Jul 2026