SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

BC xhs-note-analyzer

小红书作品分析助手。根据笔记ID或链接一键查询作品完整信息，并以专业创作者视角进行多维度深度分析，帮助高效了解作品全貌并获取可操作的优化建议。支持封面图视觉分析与账号定位判断，支持批量查询。触发词：小红书作品分析、查询小红书作品、获取小红书笔记数据、小红书内容分析、xhs笔记详情

ClawHub Agent Skills author: if530770 v1.0.1 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 436 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 21 h ago

小红书作品分析助手。根据笔记ID或链接一键查询作品完整信息，并以专业创作者视角进行多维度深度分析，帮助高效了解作品全貌并获取可操作的优化建议。支持封面图视觉分析与账号定位判断，支持批量查询。触发词：小红书作品分析、查询小红书作品、获取小红书笔记数据、小红书内容分析、xhs笔记详情

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

Analyzertype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
61
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 12 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 436 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 140: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a legitimate notes/API integration, but it handles sensitive note credentials and personal-note data with broad triggers and under-scoped network/file actions.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 9 Jul 2026