AD ia-git-worktree
Manage Git worktrees for isolated parallel development. Use when creating, listing, switching, or cleaning up git worktrees, or when needing isolated branches for concurrent reviews or feature work.
As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvscripts/worktree-manager.sh:63Reads a .env file (code comment)# Copy .env files from main repo to worktree
comment -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvscripts/worktree-manager.sh:306Reads a .env filecopy-env | env [name] Copy .env files from main repo to worktree
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvSKILL.md:45Reads a .env file| `copy-env <name>` | Copy .env files to existing worktree | `...worktree-manager.sh copy-env feature-login` |
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "class"
Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 29 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (ia-git-worktree) differs from the folder (compound-eng-git-worktree)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, git, python, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 100Steps. 25 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2181 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
- low The response is described with custom markup (16 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 198: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This worktree skill is not malicious, but it needs review because it automatically duplicates `.env` files into new worktrees and then encourages dependency installation there.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 8 Sept 2026