SKILLEMALL.ai

BC tvs-deep-interview

深度需求访谈 Skill。通过苏格拉底式单问题追问、拓扑确认、歧义评分和显式审批闸门,把模糊想法整理成可验证规格。适用于用户说深度访谈、先问我、帮我梳理、不要假设、避免做错方向,或需求复杂到直接实现容易返工的场景。必须优先使用当前 Agent 工具自己的提问、选择、确认能力。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: inksnowhailong v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 648 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 105 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1648 tokens
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 138: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 105 items
  • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
The skill appears to be a conversational clarification/interview helper, with no artifact-backed evidence of hidden execution, data theft, persistence, or destructive behavior.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026