SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AB chrome-ai-action-skill

Browser automation via Chrome AI Action (CAA) bridge. Control Chrome programmatically — navigate, click, type, screenshot, extract content, and more. Uses Puppeteer (CDP) mode. First use auto-installs npm package and starts the bridge. Chrome is auto-launched if not running.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Jami-Lin v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 951 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, consistency, progress reporting

ProcedurePlaywrightInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
68/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Consistency w 8
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (chrome-ai-action-skill) differs from the folder (chromeskill)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 18 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1951 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 275: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 39 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This browser automation skill is purpose-aligned, but it grants very broad control over Chrome and installs/runs an unpinned local bridge with limited safety boundaries.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026