SKILLEMALL.ai

AC rhino3d-scripts

Authoring and debugging scripts for Rhinoceros 3D (Rhino 8 and later). Use when asked to write RhinoScript (VBScript / .rvb / .vbs), RhinoPython, or RhinoCommon-based scripts; automate Rhino modeling tasks; build command macros; manipulate Rhino geometry, layers, blocks, or document objects; pick objects from the viewport; control redraw and undo; or load and run scripts from the Rhino Script Editor. Covers `rhinoscriptsyntax`, `scriptcontext`, the `Rhino.*` RhinoCommon namespaces (`Rhino.Geometry`, `Rhino.DocObjects`, `Rhino.Input`, `Rhino.UI`, `Rhino.Display`, `Rhino.FileIO`), and the Rhino 8 unified Script Editor.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: John Haugabook v1.1.1 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 2 813 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

GeneratorSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 46 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2813 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 624: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 6)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a documentation-only Rhino 3D scripting skill whose automation capabilities are disclosed and aligned with its purpose.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026