SKILLEMALL.ai

AC session-relay

Automatic session continuity and task handoff across context window boundaries. Use when: (1) context token usage exceeds 70% of the model's context window, (2) user starts a new session after a long conversation, (3) agent needs to preserve ongoing task state before compaction or session reset, (4) user says 'continue from last session' or 'what were we working on'. Monitors context usage, auto-saves rich task snapshots, pulls recent session history, and ensures seamless task inheritance when a new session begins.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: jianglingling007 v1.2.0 MIT-0 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 090 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ReferenceInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 85Steps. 36 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Failures and branches. 8 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2090 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 520: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is meant for session continuity, but it automatically retrieves and stores prior conversation text in workspace files without clear user confirmation.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026