SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

BC openclaw-cloudflare-secure

Securely expose an OpenClaw Gateway WebUI on a VPS via Cloudflare Zero Trust Access + Cloudflare Tunnel (cloudflared), including DNS cutover for custom hostnames and optional cleanup of Tailscale Serve.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: jskoiz v1.0.0 7 files · 4 scripts body ≈ 868 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

IntegrationCloudflareSecurityInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process scripts/tunnel_service_install.sh:14
    Starts a background / autostarted process
    sudo systemctl enable --now cloudflared

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 28 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 868 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 202: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +3All 5 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill does what it says, but it can make persistent system and DNS changes with limited safeguards or confirmation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 10 Sept 2026