AB cgcs2000
Explain and work with the CGCS2000 coordinate reference system for China geospatial workflows, including EPSG:4490 interpretation, projected CRS selection, Gauss-Kruger zoning, axis/unit checks, and comparison with WGS84, GCJ-02, and BD-09. Use when the user asks about CGCS2000, 中国大地2000, EPSG:4490, 国家2000坐标系, 高斯-克吕格分带, 坐标系选择, or CGCS2000 conversion guidance.
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Failures and branches. 6 branches
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 53 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1172 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 361: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 53 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.