AF demon-detector
多维度合约信号分析引擎 — 扫描全市场筛选妖币信号，给出独立多空研判
As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 50Steps. 2 steps
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Consistency. The Hermes dialect needs category and tags
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 159 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 34: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This crypto analysis skill appears purpose-aligned, but it needs review because it can make paid remote calls over plaintext HTTP and sends a user identifier without clear consent controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026