SKILLEMALL.ai

BF feishu-knowledge-flow

知识管理全流程:文章链接/对话内容/文稿 → 结构化总结 → 飞书知识库归档。触发词:"整理到飞书"、"帮我处理文章"、"/feishu-knowledge-flow"。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 黎可升 v1.0.1 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 742 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: {url}

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: {url}
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash(curl, Bash(rm
    allowed-tools: Bash(node *) Bash(lark-cli *) Bash(curl *) Bash(python3 *) Bash(rm *) Bash(mkdir *) Bash(cd *) WebFetch Skill

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: {url}

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: {url}
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: {url}
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 31 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1742 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 85: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
  • +4Has examples (19 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill appears to do what it claims, but it can automatically upload articles and chat summaries to Feishu without a review step.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026