BF ipo-doc-formatting
在写 Word 或改 Word 文件时，按招股书 / 审核问询反馈回复的样式要求应用格式（报告/备忘录/尽调等正式文档同归招股书版 000-009）。触发词：「按招股书样式」「招股书格式」「招股书排版」「招股书章节样式」「把这篇改成招股书格式」「这篇按招股书排一下」「按反馈回复样式」「问询回复格式」「反馈回复排版」「反馈回复排版规范」「落实函格式」「套用 000-009 样式」「套 000-009」「报告模板样式」「套模板样式」「把这个 Word 改成XXX格式」「Word 排版规范」「按投行规范排版」「排版规范一点」「文档格式统一」。核心流程：识别文档类型→加载样式模板（assets/templates/ 下报告模板.docx / 反馈回复样式.docx，模板即样式源可自定义）→路由底层工具（tencent-docx 新建 / minimax-docx apply-template 套样式 / tencent-local-office-edit 局部微调，不可用则脚本兜底并标注局限）→应用样式映射（000-009 体系、反馈回复 0011/001 监管问题黑体、标题序号九级链、表格三线表）→校验门禁（样式完整性 + 空段落检测）。与 ipo-write-response 分工：本 skill 管格式层（排版/样式），内容层方法论见 ipo-write-response。
在写 Word 或改 Word 文件时，按招股书 / 审核问询反馈回复的样式要求应用格式（报告/备忘录/尽调等正式文档同归招股书版…
As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: assets/templates/
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/templates/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: assets/templates/
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 34 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1583 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 595: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.