SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC Personality Engine

Six-system behavior engine that makes any OpenClaw agent feel alive. Editorial voice injects opinions. Selective silence knows when NOT to talk. Variable timing scores urgency with time-of-day awareness. Micro-initiations send ambient pings. Context buffer enables back-references to earlier messages. Response tracker adapts to engagement patterns. Domain-agnostic — works with trading agents, personal assistants, DevOps monitors, or any proactive agent. Part of the OpenClaw Prediction Market Trading Stack with default trading configuration.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kingmadellc v1.1.0 MIT-0 14 files body ≈ 4 861 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Personality Engine) differs from the folder (personality-engine)
    • 70Failures and branches. 8 branches
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4861 tokens
    • 85Steps. 92 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 545: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 31 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 92 items
    • +4Has examples (21 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 8 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is not clearly malicious, but it needs review because it can send unprompted messages and store user interaction history without enough consent, retention, or frequency controls.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026