SKILLEMALL.ai

BC qa-tech-selection

当团队要选测试工具(自动化框架/性能工具/管理平台)、现有工具不能满足需求需要替换、或者公司要求做技术评估时使用此技能。通过多维度对比评估(功能覆盖/学习成本/社区活跃度/维护成本/扩展性)输出推荐方案和迁移实施建议。不要只看 Gartner 象限或者技术网红推荐——工具好不好取决于你的团队能力、技术栈和实际场景。每个推荐方案附带 POC 验证计划和风险提示。 本技能属于 QA Test Skills 技能集(49 个技能之一),完整工作流体验需安装全套:npx skills add Kokxi/qa-test-skills

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kokxi v1.7.6 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 998 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 19 h ago

当团队要选测试工具(自动化框架/性能工具/管理平台)、现有工具不能满足需求需要替换、或者公司要求做技术评估时使用此技能。通过多维度对比评估(功能覆盖/学习成本/社区活跃度/维护成本/扩展性)输出推荐方案和迁移实施建议。不要只看 Gartner…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedurePlaywrightSoftware developmentOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "related_skills"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "input_format"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "output_format"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "categories"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "depth_requirement_quantification"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "error_recovery_guidance"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 16 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 998 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 265: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a guidance-only QA tool-selection skill with proportionate read and web access, and it does not show hidden installation, persistence, credential use, or destructive behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 1 Sept 2026