SKILLEMALL.ai

BC qa-test-estimation

当项目经理问"这个版本多久测完"或者需要给测试排期做资源规划时使用此技能。基于需求复杂度、变更范围和历史数据系统化估算测试人天,输出包含冒烟/功能/回归/专项的逐阶段预估。不要拍脑袋——估算必须有依据(复杂度分级 + 历史基线 + 风险系数),同时标注置信度区间和风险预留。 本技能属于 QA Test Skills 技能集(49 个技能之一),完整工作流体验需安装全套:npx skills add Kokxi/qa-test-skills

ClawHub Agent Skills author: kokxi v1.7.6 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 034 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 19 h ago

当项目经理问"这个版本多久测完"或者需要给测试排期做资源规划时使用此技能。基于需求复杂度、变更范围和历史数据系统化估算测试人天,输出包含冒烟/功能/回归/专项的逐阶段预估。不要拍脑袋——估算必须有依据(复杂度分级 + 历史基线 + 风险系数),同时标注置信度区间和风险预留。 本技能属于 QA Test Skills…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

Proceduretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "related_skills"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "input_format"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "output_format"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "categories"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "depth_requirement_quantification"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "error_recovery_guidance"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 18 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1034 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 221: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a QA test-estimation template with limited read-only tool access and no evidence of hidden execution, persistence, or data exfiltration.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 1 Sept 2026