AB privacy-solution-scorecard
Evaluate and compare privacy solution vendors with a weighted scorecard across 12 criteria. Use when selecting privacy management software, comparing data protection tools, evaluating consent management platforms, assessing privacy vendor proposals, or building a privacy tool business case.
As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, consistency, running it twice
The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (privacy-solution-scorecard) differs from the folder (k8s-network-policy-generator)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 64 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2183 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 291: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 64 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.