SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC multi-topic-board

Multi-Topic Board: AI Agent active topic tracking and task closed-loop management. Tracks unresolved discussions, auto-updates aging days, sends timeout alerts after 3 days with no task, and generates execution tasks in tasks/. Triggered when: (1) user discusses a topic without conclusion; (2) user asks where things left off; (3) user wants to track pending decisions.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 戴龙虾 v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 727 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "stage"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 23 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1727 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 370: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 20 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
    • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is useful for tracking unfinished discussions, but it can create persistent workspace files and recurring background agent workflows without a clear opt-in step.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026