AB tencent-cloud-rum-2.1
Query Tencent Cloud RUM data, analyze Web performance (LCP/FCP/WebVitals), troubleshoot JS/Promise errors, analyze API latency & error rates, diagnose slow static resource loading, and view PV/UV. Supports RUM-APM correlation. Not for: backend-only performance, native mobile performance, or non-Tencent Cloud RUM platforms.
As a process B 70/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: consistency, running it twice
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (tencent-cloud-rum-2.1) differs from the folder (tencent-cloud-rum-skill)
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 81 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3123 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 17 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- -215 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 324: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 29 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 81 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.