SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC agent-store

Use when the user wants to buy, purchase, order, pay for, or top up API keys or API credits.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: levey v1.0.2 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 255 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token scripts/store.py:27
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      PERM…ESS = "0x00…BA3"
      quoted
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token scripts/store.py:28
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      X402…ESS = "0x40…001"
      quoted

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 56 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1255 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 92: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 56 items
    • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill appears to be a real wallet-backed purchase workflow, but it needs review because it can spend funds, approve token use, buy an under-described VPS product, and change future agent model settings.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026