AA lastxdays
Research and summarize what happened in the last N days (or a date range) about a topic, optionally using Reddit API and X ingestion via x-cli/API/archive with graceful fallback to web.
As a process A 84/100 · Runs to the end — no weak spots found
IntegrationInfrastructureWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 84/100
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 83 steps
- 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Failures and branches. 7 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1655 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 185: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 83 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This research skill is useful in concept, but it can run unbundled local helper commands and use local Reddit/X credentials or archives without a clear opt-in boundary.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026