BF linkfox-amazon-reviews-list
按ASIN获取并分析亚马逊商品评论，支持15个站点(含美国站)，按星级筛选评论。当用户提到亚马逊评论、美国站评论、商品评价、买家投诉、差评、好评、星级评分、评论分析、评论情感、产品改良建议、Vine评论、已验证购买评论、竞品评论研究、Amazon reviews, US reviews, Amazon.com reviews, product feedback, negative review analysis, positive review analysis, star rating filter, review sentiment analysis, product improvement insights, Vine reviews, competitor reviews, customer feedback时触发此技能。即使用户未明确说"评论"，只要其需求涉及读取、筛选或分析亚马逊商品的买家评论，也应触发此技能。
按ASIN获取并分析亚马逊商品评论，支持15个站点(含美国站)，按星级筛选评论。当用户提到亚马逊评论、美国站评论、商品评价、买家投诉、差评、好评、星级评分、评论分析、评论情感、产品改良建议、Vine评论、已验证购买评论、竞品评论研究、Amazon reviews, US reviews, Amazon.com…
As a process F 41/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/api.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/api.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/api.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 100Steps. 39 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2019 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 417: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.