BF linkfox-ecommerce-compliance-detection
电商知识产权与合规检测一站式 AI 工具集，整合睿观知产合规检测（版权/商标/外观专利/实用新型专利/图片政策）与智慧芽专利数据查询（著录/权利要求/说明书/附图/法律状态/家族/引用/以图搜图/PDF）共 2 类底层工具、22 项子能力。
电商知识产权与合规检测一站式 AI 工具集，整合睿观知产合规检测（版权/商标/外观专利/实用新型专利/图片政策）与智慧芽专利数据查询（著录/权利要求/说明书/附图/法律状态/家族/引用/以图搜图/PDF）共 2 类底层工具、22 项子能力。
As a process F 34/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/upload_image.py, references/<子能力>.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 6, column 17: description_en: One-stop e-commerce IP & compliance detection AI toolkit integr… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/upload_image.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/<子能力>.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name_en" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "description_zh" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "description_en"
Process rating: all ten parameters 34/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/upload_image.py, references/<子能力>.md
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/upload_image.py, references/<子能力>.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4009 tokens
- 100Steps. 36 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low The response is described with custom markup (8 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 12 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 120: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
- +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (23 of 23)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 51.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches its LinkFox compliance-checking purpose, but it needs Review because it sends credentials to environment-selected endpoints and may save full results outside the location it promises.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 14 Aug 2026