BC linkfox-product-title-analyze
对产品标题进行分词分析，提取词频、场景词、人群词、材质词等属性维度。当用户想分析产品标题、提取标题高频词、进行标题分词、发现场景词或人群词、对比不同商品的标题关键词用法、基于词频优化Listing标题、识别一组ASIN中的常见属性规律、title tokenization, word frequency analysis, scene keyword extraction, audience keyword analysis, title optimization, attribute keyword extraction, keyword frequency时触发此技能。即使用户未明确说"标题分析"，只要其需求涉及将产品标题拆解为有意义的词组、统计关键词频率或按提取的属性对商品分组，也应触发此技能。
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcreferences/onboarding.md:13Writes to a shell startup file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- macOS zsh：`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.zshrc && source ~/.zshrc`
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcreferences/onboarding.md:14Writes to a shell startup file (detector / deny-list definition)- Linux bash：`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.bashrc && source ~/.bashrc`
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/onboarding.py:49High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)or "eyJh…iJ9")
quoted
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 100Steps. 21 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1912 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 355: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.