SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

BF developer-skills

开发者十二铁律 + 开发规范 + 高级调试方法论 — 开发者核心技能（合并自 diagnose）

ClawHub Agent Skills author: SKIES v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 9 666 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 24 h ago

开发者十二铁律 + 开发规范 + 高级调试方法论 — 开发者核心技能（合并自 diagnose）

As a process F 40/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/remote-push.py

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
81/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
52
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
40/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/remote-push.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
  3. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 9666 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/remote-push.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 40/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/remote-push.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/remote-push.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 18 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 9666 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Steps. 193 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 48: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -259 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 79 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 193 items
  • +4Has examples (49 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 52.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a developer guidance skill with broad coding and debugging advice, but it has no hidden installer, executable payload, or automatic data access.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 17 Jul 2026