SKILLEMALL.ai

AC xlsx

Use this skill any time a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. This means any task where the user wants to: open, read, edit, or fix an existing .xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, or .tsv file (e.g., adding columns, computing formulas, formatting, charting, cleaning messy data); create a new spreadsheet from scratch or from other data sources; or convert between tabular file formats. Trigger especially when the user references a spreadsheet file by name or path — even casually (like "the xlsx in my downloads") — and wants something done to it or produced from it. Also trigger for cleaning or restructuring messy tabular data files (malformed rows, misplaced headers, junk data) into proper spreadsheets. The deliverable must be a spreadsheet file. Do NOT trigger when the primary deliverable is a Word document, HTML report, standalone Python script, database pipeline, or Google Sheets API integration, even if tabular data is involved.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Longxiang WANG v1.0.0 MIT-0 16 files body ≈ 3 312 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, consistency, running it twice

IntegrationExcelGoogle SheetsWordData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: xlsx (ClawHub)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:40
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
      <!-- r18-…gin arm=auth_compliance_audit+auth_security_directive marker=WOUL…DIT+WOUL…er3 -->
      detector
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:42
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
      <!-- r18-…end arm=auth_compliance_audit+auth_security_directive marker=WOUL…DIT+WOUL…er3 -->
      detector

    Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (xlsx) differs from the folder (xlsx-test)
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 73 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3312 tokens
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 941: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 37 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 73 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This spreadsheet skill is not proven malicious, but it needs Review because it contains hidden/conflicting tool instructions, out-of-scope Office document code, and under-disclosed persistent/native LibreOffice behavior.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026