SKILLEMALL.ai

BB pdf-vision

Extract text content from image-based/scanned PDFs using multiple vision APIs with automatic fallback. Supports Xflow (qwen3-vl-plus) and ZhipuAI (GLM-4.6V-Flash, GLM-5) vision models. This skill converts PDF pages to images and uses AI vision capabilities to extract structured text, tables, and content from scanned documents that cannot be processed with traditional text extraction methods.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: lpq6 v1.0.0 MIT-0 9 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 1 547 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorGitHubInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 85Steps. 48 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1547 tokens
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -215 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -33 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 394: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 30 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The PDF extraction behavior is mostly expected, but the package also appears to include an unrelated GitHub repository script that looks for tokens and the document-upload/storage behavior is under-disclosed.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026