SKILLEMALL.ai

AD record-keeper

工作记录归档标准。当用户要求记录工作内容时,严格按照本 skill 的类别和模板执行。 触发场景:记录会议、记录需求、记录规划、写SOP、写复盘/报告、值班/人事等行政记录、创建记录文件、归档工作记录。 类别严格封闭,共13类:meeting / requirement / plan / sop / report / admin / badcase / task / weekly / monthly / quarterly / yearly / memo,不可自行扩展。 所有记录文件存放在 records/YYYY-MM/ 下,文件名格式:[YYYYMMDD]-[category]-[topic]-[sub-topic]-[seq].md badcase 类使用专用文件名格式:[YYYYMMDD]-badcase-[service]-[keyword/topic][-seq].md

ClawHub Agent Skills author: SUN BO v1.0.0 MIT-0 19 files body ≈ 2 457 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 23 h ago

工作记录归档标准。当用户要求记录工作内容时,严格按照本 skill 的类别和模板执行。 触发场景:记录会议、记录需求、记录规划、写SOP、写复盘/报告、值班/人事等行政记录、创建记录文件、归档工作记录。 类别严格封闭,共13类:meeting / requirement / plan / sop / report…

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Exfiltration read-dotenv SKILL.md:294
    Reads a .env file
    source .env && python3 embed.py init     # 第一个词是 source

Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "alwaysLoad"

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 116 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2457 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 396: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 30 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 116 items
  • +4Has examples (15 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (15 of 15)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This record-keeping skill is mostly coherent, but it automatically sends work-record content and search text to a third-party embedding API and persists a local index without enough user control.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 8 Jul 2026