SKILLEMALL.ai

AB grc-agent-soc2-quality-review

Evaluate SOC 2 report quality using the SOC 2 Quality Guild rubric (Structure, Substance, Source). Use when reviewing a vendor SOC 2 Type 1/Type 2 report, triaging report credibility, producing a risk memo, or preparing diligence follow-up questions and evidence requests.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Simon Tin-Yul Kok v1.0.0 9 files body ≈ 1 447 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
68/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security skill-card.md:21
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      Risk: The skill is a quality review aid and could be mistaken for legal advice, certification, penetration testing, or formal compliance approval. <br>
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:29
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      - Deep technical penetration testing or exploit validation.

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
    • 100Steps. 67 steps
    • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1447 tokens
    • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 272: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 18 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 67 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is an instruction-only SOC 2 report review aid, with no code execution, persistence, credential handling, or hidden data-transfer behavior found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026