SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AF lead-scorer

Score a website lead 0–100 based on audit signals from the website-auditor skill, assign a priority tier (Hot/Warm/Lukewarm/Cold), and write the result to a Google Sheet. Applies a weighted rubric across 8 audit dimensions. Use as the final step in the lead list building pipeline after website-auditor and contact-enrichment have run. Requires GOOGLE_SHEET_NAME and GOOGLE_CREDS_FILE for Google Sheets output.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: maverick-software v1.0.0 2 files body ≈ 2 667 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process F 34/100 · Will not run — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerGoogle SheetsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
34/100
Will not run
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 34/100

    • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (lead-scorer) differs from the folder (lead-scorer-pro)
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2667 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3No numbered steps or checklist
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 410: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill has a coherent lead-scoring purpose, but it can create a Google Sheet containing lead contact data and make it publicly writable.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026