SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AB youmind-wordpress-article

Write and publish WordPress articles end-to-end with AI — topic mining via YouMind knowledge base, de-AI voice writing, Markdown-to-HTML conversion, featured image upload, and one-click publishing. Use when user wants to "wordpress article", "publish to wordpress", "wp article", "wp post", "WordPress 文章", "发布到 WordPress". Do NOT trigger for: WeChat articles, Ghost posts, emails/newsletters, PPT, short video scripts.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: YouMind v1.0.0 MIT-0 24 files body ≈ 2 721 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 10 h ago

Write and publish WordPress articles end-to-end with AI — topic mining via YouMind knowledge base, de-AI voice writing, Markdown-to-HTML conversion, featured…

As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorWordPressWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
69/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 24. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 174, 184, 187): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 18 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 26 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2721 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 419: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is mostly transparent about publishing to WordPress, but it exposes broader site-admin actions than an article-writing skill needs.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026