SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AB security

Runs a backend-backed live safety check for instructions that may trigger tool execution, external calls, file edits, permission changes, destructive or irreversible actions, prompt injection, or compliance-sensitive operations. Use before executing instructions with side effects; skip pure read-only chat, planning, or pre-install repository auditing.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: modeioai v0.1.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 914 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, consistency

AnalyzerSoftware developmentInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: security (ClawHub)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (security) differs from the folder (security-2)
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 23 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 914 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 353: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a disclosed safety-check CLI that sends the instruction being checked to a Modeio backend and shows no hidden persistence, destructive behavior, or credential collection.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026