BF dataecho
Deploy anything an agent builds to a live URL via the DataEcho platform at https://dataecho.ai — a single file, a static site, OR a server-side app (any stack) by including a Dockerfile. Also private cloud Drives for agent memory/handoff. Use whenever the user asks to publish, host, share, deploy, or "put online" a file, site, or app (CRM, dashboard, API, tool), or to store/hand off files across sessions.
Deploy anything an agent builds to a live URL via the DataEcho platform at https://dataecho.ai — a single file, a static site, OR a server-side app (any…
As a process F 44/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/publish.sh, scripts/drive.sh
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shellSKILL.md:29Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -fsSL https://dataecho.ai/install.sh | bash
vendor-host
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/publish.sh - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/drive.sh
Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/publish.sh, scripts/drive.sh
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 19 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 11 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1482 tokens
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
- low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 408: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.