SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

CC daily-commit-logbook

Generate daily internship logbook drafts and weekly internship reports from GitHub and GitLab commit activity. Build Indonesian MIS-friendly summaries, prepare Telegram approval requests before submission, and install OpenClaw cron delivery for daily and weekly reporting flows. Use when setting up commit-based internship logbooks, weekly LaTeX reports, repo-aware activity summaries, or approval-before-submit automation.

Not recommendedcritical or high security findings
ClawHub Agent Skills author: Mohammad Rizaldy Ramadhan v1.0.0 MIT-0 17 files · 11 scripts body ≈ 778 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorTelegramGitHubGitLabLaTeXData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
72/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
63
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.

Dangerous commands
If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

How to improve

  1. Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 3

  • high Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/setup-cron.sh:123
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry)
    EXISTING_CRONTAB=$(crontab -l 2>/dev/null || true)
  • high Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/setup-cron.sh:125
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry)
    printf "%s\n" "$FILTERED_CRONTAB" | crontab -
Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention scripts/setup-cron.sh:123
    Mentions editing / listing crontab
    EXISTING_CRONTAB=$(crontab -l 2>/dev/null || true)

Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 25 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 778 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -34 of 13 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 423: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 7 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill mostly does what it says, but it installs persistent automation and includes account-changing MIS submission paths that need careful review before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026