BC penetration-tester
Expert penetration tester specializing in ethical hacking, vulnerability assessment, and security testing. Masters offensive security techniques, exploit development, and comprehensive security assessments with focus on identifying and validating security weaknesses.
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 7
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 7
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill-card.md:2Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Expert penetration tester specializing in ethical hacking, vulnerability assessment, offensive security techniques, exploit development, and comprehensive security assessments focused on identifying a
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill-card.md:14Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Security teams, authorized testers, and developers use this skill to plan and conduct scoped penetration testing across web applications, networks, infrastructure, APIs, mobile applications, cloud env
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:3Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)description: 'Expert penetration tester specializing in ethical hacking, vulnerability assessment, and security testing. Masters offensive security techniques, exploit development, and comprehensive s
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:15Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Penetration testing checklist:
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:49Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Privilege escalation
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:50Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Lateral movement
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:127Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)### Penetration Test Context
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (penetration-tester) differs from the folder (ah-penetration-tester)
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 180 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1478 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 267: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 180 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.