SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AF claude-usage-tracker

Track Claude.ai token usage and session costs by scraping the Claude.ai usage dashboard. Use when you need to monitor spend or compare usage across sessions.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Nissan Dookeran v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 398 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process F 44/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/claude-usage-tracker.py

ReferenceAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
44/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/claude-usage-tracker.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/claude-usage-tracker.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/claude-usage-tracker.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/claude-usage-tracker.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Steps. 20 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1398 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 157: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
The reviewed skill artifacts are coherent ClawHub and Convex workflow helpers with disclosed command use, including some powerful maintainer actions that require care.
LLM: benign (medium) · 28 May 2026