SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AF dicom-metadata-extract

Used for extracting selected metadata from one DICOM file and flagging standard-tag PHI presence. Not for anonymization or clinical use.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: NVIDIA 1 file body ≈ 731 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 12 h ago

Used for extracting selected metadata from one DICOM file and flagging standard-tag PHI presence.

As a process F 54/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/extract_metadata.py

ReferenceSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
54/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/extract_metadata.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Bash

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/extract_metadata.py
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "permissions"

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/extract_metadata.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/extract_metadata.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 14 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 731 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 136: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 7 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.