AF hsb-ip-def
Generate, validate, compare, or explain HSB HOLOLINK_def.svh macros. Do not use for FPGA_top.sv wrappers or packetizer-only derivation. Generation runs bundled Python scripts locally through shell commands and writes validated .svh output files after user-confirmed paths.
Generate, validate, compare, or explain HSB HOLOLINKdef.svh macros. Do not use for FPGAtop.sv wrappers or packetizer-only derivation. Generation runs bundled…
As a process F 54/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/macro-reference.md, references/script-usage.md, scripts/validate_def.py
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/macro-reference.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/script-usage.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/validate_def.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/generate-workflow.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/generate_def.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/validation-rules.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/top-port-map.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/init-reg-cookbook.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/advanced-macros.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/archetypes.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/compare_defs.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/build_corpus_metadata.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/metadata/corpus.json - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/metadata/corpus-stats.json - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "permissions"
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Tools and files. 14 referenced file(s) missing: references/macro-reference.md, references/script-usage.md, scripts/validate_def.py
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 43 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2621 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 272: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
- +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.