BF nv-generate-ct-rflow
Used for generating synthetic CT volumes and masks with NV-Generate-CTMR rflow-ct. Not for production training data without review.
Used for generating synthetic CT volumes and masks with NV-Generate-CTMR rflow-ct.
As a process F 57/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: fixtures/README.md, scripts/run_rflow_ct.py, scripts/_anatomy.py
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Bash
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: fixtures/README.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/run_rflow_ct.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/_anatomy.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/_summary_card.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/list_anatomies.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/run_ct_mask.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/run_ct_from_mask.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/run_ct_image.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/fov-and-downloads.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/ct-mask-label-space.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/ct-from-mask-format.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Tools and files. 11 referenced file(s) missing: fixtures/README.md, scripts/run_rflow_ct.py, scripts/_anatomy.py
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 21 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2991 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 131: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.