SKILLEMALL.ai

BC a2a-manager

Agent-to-Agent Manager dành cho Coordinator/Orchestrator. Sử dụng khi: (1) Tạo agent mới theo yêu cầu, (2) Quản lý Discord Category/Channel/Role, (3) Binding agent với channel, (4) Điều phối agent-to-agent, (5) Tạo/cập nhật A2A_MAP.md (từ template cứng trong script), (6) Spawn/dispose Specialists (sub-agents), (7) Quản lý task workflow với Notion.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Cuong Pahm v1.0.0 9 files body ≈ 778 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

TemplateNotionDiscordAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Agent-to-Agent Manager dành cho Coordinator/Orchestrator. Sử dụng … ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 21 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 778 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 349: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 5 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill matches its agent-management purpose, but it needs Review because it can change persistent local and external task state and delete local workspaces without enough scoping or confirmation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026