AC widgets-ui
Declarative UI widgets from JSON for React/Next.js from ui.inference.sh. Render rich interactive UIs from structured agent responses. Capabilities: forms, buttons, cards, layouts, inputs, selects, checkboxes. Use for: agent-generated UIs, dynamic forms, data display, interactive cards. Triggers: widgets, declarative ui, json ui, widget renderer, agent widgets," dynamic ui, form widgets, card widgets, shadcn widgets, structured output ui
As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Unexpected scalar at node end at line 2, column 380: … ui, widget renderer, agent widgets," dynamic ui, form widgets, card widgets,… ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 75Steps. 3 steps
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1117 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 441: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.