SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AB open-source-project-polish

Turn a project folder into a polished open source project. Use when: open source ready, polish README, default MIT license, add LICENSE/CONTRIBUTING/CODE_OF_CONDUCT/CHANGELOG, automatically create public GitHub remote for projects without git remote, prepare repository for public release. Only add or modify project metadata/docs, never change source code.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Ge Haizhou v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 151 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, progress reporting

GeneratorGitHubSoftware developmentWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
69/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 64 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Failures and branches. 7 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2151 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 357: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 64 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is mostly a documentation-polishing helper, but it defaults to creating and pushing to a public GitHub repository, which can expose a project before the user has clearly approved publication.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026