BC web-recon
Website vulnerability scanner and security audit toolkit. Scan any website for security issues: open ports (nmap), exposed secrets, subdomain enumeration, directory bruteforce, security header scoring, CORS misconfigurations, SSL/TLS analysis, WordPress vulnerabilities, and more. One command, full report. Pentesting and OSINT reconnaissance for web applications.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 6
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 6
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/wordlists.md:26Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| Passwords/10k-most-common.txt | Password spraying |
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usescripts/webscan.sh:198Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (documentation of a security skill)curl -s "https://api.shodan.io/shodan/host/$IP?key=…" > "$OUTDIR/shodan.json" 2>/dev/null || true
security skill -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill-card.md:2Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)Website vulnerability scanner and security audit toolkit for web application pentesting, bug bounty reconnaissance, and security audits. <br>
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:3Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)description: "Website vulnerability scanner and security audit toolkit. Scan any website for security issues: open ports (nmap), exposed secrets, subdomain enumeration, directory bruteforce, security
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:8Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)**All-in-one web security scanner for pentesting, bug bounty, and security audits.**
detector
A further 1 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 14 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1249 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 364: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.