AC andrew-memory
Product-grade semantic memory layer for AI agents using LanceDB. Provides long-term memory with semantic search, Core Identity management, and conversation distillation. Use when: (1) Learning new facts about the user, (2) Searching for past context, (3) Maintaining consistent persona across sessions, (4) Extracting key memories from conversations.
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:51High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…LRB+Iwx/uvwt…Jwj/5voteal+53jQ…wUw==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:67High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…xPU+DMt6…J8w==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:131High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…S4n+SYBL…DIg==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:163High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…u8g+OEVd…VlM/cyFY…Tgh/ShZZI9ed+ozEq+Ngt+rgmUs8tw==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:173High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…nOa+n+n5rE…eab/duDP…2Kw==",
detector
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 16 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 667 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 350: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.