SKILLEMALL.ai

BC reva

Complete Reva wallet management - passwordless authentication, PayID name claiming, multi-chain crypto transfers to PayIDs or wallet addresses, balance tracking across networks, account details information, and deposit management

ClawHub Agent Skills author: redd v0.1.5 11 files · 9 scripts body ≈ 3 790 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:207
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    Example 4: "send 1 eth on ethereum to 0x74…bEb"
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:214
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
    recipientWalletAddress: 0x74…bEb

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "dependencies"

Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 175 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 16 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3790 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low The response is described with custom markup (13 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -32 of 9 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 229: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 32 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 175 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This Reva wallet skill is mostly coherent, but it can move cryptocurrency without a clear final confirmation step and includes under-disclosed remote message handling.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026