AC twitter-agent
AI+Crypto Twitter automation agent. Post tweets, reply to KOLs, and quote tweet trending content. Integrates with opentwitter/opennews (6551) for hot topic fetching and Claude for content generation.
As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, failures and branches, running it twice
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 11 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 741 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 199: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is coherent Twitter/X automation, but it can publish live posts, replies, and quote tweets from an agent without built-in preview or approval controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026