BC image-outpainting-runcomfy
Image outpainting on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI — extend a still beyond its original canvas, fill in what the camera didn't capture, change aspect ratio (square → 16:9, portrait → landscape) while preserving the original content. Routes across Nano Banana 2 Edit (default, spatial-language driven), GPT Image 2 Edit (multi-ref with reference-style matching), FLUX Kontext Pro (single-shot maximum-preservation), and the brand edit endpoints (Seedream / Dreamina / Qwen / FLUX 2). Picks the right route based on whether the outpaint is prose-driven, reference-driven, or brand-locked. Triggers on "outpaint", "outpainting", "extend image canvas", "expand the image", "fill in around the photo", "uncrop", "change aspect ratio", "extend frame", "wide-screen from square", or any explicit ask to add canvas around an existing still.
Image outpainting on RunComfy via the runcomfy CLI — extend a still beyond its original canvas, fill in what the camera didn't capture, change aspect ratio…
As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "emoji" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "clawdis"
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 33 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2619 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 834: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 9 example trigger phrases
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.