BD service-matching
C+服务需求匹配技能。基于真实Excel台账（美兰中心C+服务.xlsx）挖掘企业需求，匹配C+服务资源。触发场景：(1) 管家上传走访记录，(2) 定时任务每日10:00分析昨日走访记录，(3) 手动触发服务匹配（@企服助手 服务匹配）。
C+服务需求匹配技能。基于真实Excel台账（美兰中心C+服务.xlsx）挖掘企业需求，匹配C+服务资源。触发场景：(1) 管家上传走访记录，(2) 定时任务每日10:00分析昨日走访记录，(3) 手动触发服务匹配（@企服助手 服务匹配）。
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Steps. 2 steps
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2874 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
- -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 120: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 21 headings
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 58.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is not clearly malicious, but it needs review because it can read a real tenant Excel ledger, save follow-up changes into it, and send tenant details to WeCom without strong approval or privacy controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 8 Jun 2026