SKILLEMALL.ai

AD Content Humanizer Audit

AI content signature detector for social media posts. Measures 8 linguistic dimensions that LinkedIn's 360Brew and other platforms use to detect AI-generated content — lexical diversity, sentence length variance, transition word density, hedging ratio, contraction usage, personal pronoun density, question frequency, and specific data density. Not a humanizer that rewrites your text — an auditor that tells you exactly which signals are triggering detection so you fix only what's wrong. Research-backed (DivEye arXiv:2509.18880, LinkedIn 360Brew algorithm analysis, stylometric detection studies). Per-platform thresholds for LinkedIn (strictest), Reddit, Twitter/X, HackerNews. Zero external dependencies.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Lucius Pang v1.0.3 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 934 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructureMarketingResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Content Humanizer Audit) differs from the folder (phy-content-humanizer-audit)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 15 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1934 tokens
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 709: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 15 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This is a local text-checking skill, but it explicitly helps users tune social posts to avoid AI-content detection, so it belongs in Review.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 27 May 2026